Metadata synchronization system

ABSTRACT

A metadata synchronization system is provided. The metadata synchronization system may include a plurality of metadata elements included in a plurality of applications. The plurality of applications may be coupled to a plurality of application hubs. The plurality of application hubs may be coupled to a federated metadata repository. The plurality of application hubs may be coupled to a governed metadata repository. The system may include crawling the plurality of applications, the plurality of application hubs, the federated metadata repository and the governed metadata repository to ensure that the metadata elements are synchronized across all of the components. In the event that a metadata element is not synchronized across any one of the components, the system may notify interested parties and/or resolve the discrepancy.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to metadata. Specifically, this invention relatesto metadata synchronization across a variety of computer components.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many applications in a computer system include metadata. For thepurposes of this application, metadata may be understood to be datacharacterizing data. It may be desirable for the metadata elements to becontinually synchronized across a variety of applications.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

Discovery of metadata information or metadata discrepancies may beprovided. A Becubic™ system may perform scans for discrepancies.Application hubs may perform application modeling.

A method for metadata synchronization is provided. The method mayinclude receiving, from a plurality of applications, a plurality ofmetadata elements at a federated metadata repository. The plurality ofapplications may be coupled to a plurality of application hubs. Thetransmission of the metadata may be through the application hubs.

The method may include receiving a subset of the plurality of metadataelements at a governed metadata repository. The subset of metadataelements may be entity-critical metadata elements.

The method may include crawling the plurality of applications todetermine that each metadata element has been received at the federatedmetadata repository. A crawler may perform the crawling.

Upon crawling the plurality of applications, the crawler may identify ametadata element that has not been received at the federated metadatarepository. The method may also include transmitting a firstnotification message to a first user upon identification of theindependent metadata element. The first user may be an application ownerassociated with the identified metadata element. Upon receipt of thefirst notification message, the first user may couple the independentmetadata element to the federated metadata repository.

In some embodiments, a computer, or algorithm may take the place of thefirst user. The computer or algorithm may receive the notification ofthe message. Upon receipt of the notification message, the computer oralgorithm may couple the independent metadata element to the federatedmetadata repository.

The method may also include crawling the federated metadata repositoryand the governed metadata repository to determine whether each metadataelement that is included in both of the metadata repositories areidentified using the same data type. The crawling may be performed by acrawler.

For the purposes of this application, data type may be a characterizedas follows. Specifically, data type may refer to an account number oftype string in one system and an account number of a different type inanother system. Another example may be an account number with adescription that states “Account Number” in one system and states “Thisaccount number represents . . . ” in another system.

Upon identification of a metadata element which is identified using onedata type in the federated metadata repository and another data type inthe governed metadata repository, the method may also include conformingthe data types of the identified metadata elements.

The method may also include transmitting a second notification messageto a second user upon completion of the conforming.

In some embodiments, the second notification message may be transmittedupon identification of the metadata element that is identified using onedata type in the federated metadata repository and another data type inthe governed metadata repository. In these embodiments, a distinctcomputer and/or algorithm may perform the conforming, as describedabove.

The method may include crawling the federated metadata repository andthe governed metadata repository to determine which metadata elementsshould be assigned to the governed repository, i.e., assigned a governedstatus.

In some embodiments, metadata elements with a governed status mayincorporate more fields than federated metadata elements.

In certain embodiments, one can search or filter metadata elements bycategory. This may be understood to mean that a metadata element maybelong to a group or specific category. An example of a category may bean Account Number.

In some embodiments, matching information may be presented on thescreen. The system may enable a user to choose metadata elements, addadditional metadata elements and move data elements to the governedmetadata repository.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent uponconsideration of the following detailed description, taken inconjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like referencecharacters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:

FIG. 1A shows an illustrative flow chart of an embodiment of theinvention;

FIG. 1B shows an illustrative hub of an embodiment of the invention;

FIGS. 2A and 2B show an illustrative flow chart of an embodiment of theinvention; and

FIG. 3 shows an illustrative flow chart of an embodiment of theinvention;

FIG. 4 shows an illustrative flow chart of an embodiment of theinvention;

FIGS. 5A and 5B show an illustrative flow chart of an embodiment of theinvention;

FIGS. 6A and 6B show an illustrative user interface of an embodiment ofthe invention;

FIG. 7 shows an illustrative user interface of an embodiment of theinvention;

FIGS. 8A, 8B and 8C show an illustrative database model diagram of anembodiment of the invention; and

FIGS. 9A and 9B show an illustrative database model diagram of anembodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE

A system for synchronizing metadata across a plurality of applicationsis provided. The system may include a plurality of applications. Eachapplication may include a plurality of metadata elements. Eachapplication may be coupled to an application hub included in a pluralityof application hubs. The plurality of application hubs may include oneor more of an enterprise hub, a customer hub, a payment card hub, amortgage hub, a payments hub, a global wealth and investment managementhub and a deposits hub.

The system may also include the plurality of applications hubs. Eachapplication hub may include data elements baseline metadata. The dataelements baseline metadata may control the plurality of metadataelements associated with each application to which it is coupled. Eachof the data elements baseline metadata may be coupled to a glossary. Theglossary may include a universal set of metadata elements that can beutilized across substantially all the application hubs.

In some embodiments, each hub may be associated with its own glossary.The glossary may enable a user to import data catalog information. Ametadata element may be stored without a description, but a description,associated with the metadata element, may be included in the glossary.The system may enable a user to retrieve the description from theglossary. The system may also enable a user to enter business relatedmetadata into the glossary. Entering business related metadata into theglossary may be useful in a situation where it is difficult to enter themetadata information elsewhere.

The system may also include a federated metadata repository. Thefederated metadata repository may be configured to receive the pluralityof metadata elements from the application hubs. The federated metadatarepository may be coupled to each application hub. The coupling may bevia a landing zone and/or a loading process.

The system may also include a governed metadata repository. The governedmetadata repository may be coupled to the federated metadata repository.The governed metadata repository may be configured to receive a subsetof metadata elements from the federated metadata repository.

The governed metadata elements—i.e., the metadata elements included inthe governed metadata repository—may be entity-critical metadataelements. The governed metadata elements may include greater detail thanthe federated metadata elements—i.e., the metadata elements included inthe federated metadata repository.

The system may also include a crawler. The crawler may be configured tocrawl applications to ensure that each metadata element is copied intothe federated metadata repository. The crawler may also be configured tocrawl applications to ensure that each metadata element is up to datewith a current set of metadata requirements.

The metadata requirements may be a set of requirements with which themetadata elements may be required to conform. For example, metadatarequirements may require metadata data type rules and amount ofcharacters per metadata element rules.

When a crawler identifies a metadata element in an application that doesnot conform with the current set of metadata requirements, the crawlermay be configured to transmit a notification message to an owner of theapplication. The message may include the metadata element and currentmetadata element requirements. The application owner may executeappropriate changes to the application's metadata upon receipt of thenotification message. The execution of the appropriate changes may beincluded in the re-loading of the metadata elements to the metadatarepositories. The execution of the appropriate changes may occur at anyother suitable time.

As described above, the system may enable modeling in a glossary—i.e.,if a description is not associated with a metadata element, it may beretrieved from the glossary.

The crawler may also be configured to crawl the plurality ofapplications to identify a new metadata element in an application thatis not coupled to the federated metadata repository. In response toidentification of a new metadata element that is not coupled to thefederated metadata repository, the crawler may be configured to transmita notification message to persons associated with the owner of theapplication. The message may include the new metadata element. Themessage may also include current metadata element requirements.

The system may also include a technical discrepancy processor. Thetechnical discrepancy processor may be coupled to the federated metadatarepository and the governed metadata repository. The technicaldiscrepancy processor may be configured to determine technicaldiscrepancies between metadata elements stored in the federated metadatarepository and metadata elements stored in the governed metadatarepository. Technical discrepancies may be metadata character sizediscrepancies, metadata data type discrepancies or any other suitabletechnical discrepancy.

The system may also include a technical notification processor. Thetechnical notification processor may be coupled to the technicaldiscrepancy processor. The technical notification processor may beconfigured to transmit a technical notification message to an executionteam. The technical notification message may include the determinedtechnical discrepancies.

The system may also include a business discrepancy processor. Thebusiness discrepancy processor may be coupled to the federated metadatarepository and the governed metadata repository. The businessdiscrepancy processor may be configured to determine businessdiscrepancies between metadata elements stored in the federated metadatarepository and the governed metadata repository. One example of abusiness discrepancy may be a metadata element that is labeled agoverned element in one repository and is labeled a federated element inanother repository. Another example of a business discrepancy may be ametadata element that includes one description in one repository andincludes another description in another repository.

The system may also include a business notification processor. Thebusiness notification processor may be coupled to the businessdiscrepancy processor. The business notification processor may beconfigured to transmit a business notification message to the executionteam. The business notification message may include the determinedbusiness discrepancies.

The business notification processor may be coupled to Appian™ workflow.Appian™ workflow may enable an execution team to act upon thechanges—e.g., review the changes, decide on the changes and execute thechanges. Appian™ workflow is described in more detail below.

Illustrative embodiments of apparatus and methods in accordance with theprinciples of the invention will now be described with reference to theaccompanying drawings, which form a part hereof. It is to be understoodthat other embodiments may be utilized and structural, functional andprocedural modifications may be made without departing from the scopeand spirit of the present invention.

The metadata synchronization system may include a plurality ofapplications, a plurality of application hubs, a plurality of databases,a plurality of notification points and a plurality of data repositories.Each application may be coupled to an application hub. Each applicationmay have associated metadata. Metadata may be data about data, e.g., anapplication name, an application type description, etc.

There may be shared metadata elements between applications, e.g., eachapplication in the plurality of applications may have some of the samemetadata elements as another application in the plurality ofapplications. Each shared metadata element should be of the same type(e.g., string, character, variant character, etc.). While each sharedmetadata element may have a different title in different systems, forexample, one system may identify a metadata element as data type stringand another system may identify the metadata element as data typenumber, because the components are the same, the elements may matchregardless of their respective titles. Homogenizing the metadata amongthe applications may enable the system to uniformly manipulate themetadata and assess the metadata in a homogeneous manner. Keys may beutilized to manipulate the metadata and assess the metadata in ahomogeneous manner. An example of a key may be a 5-part key. The 5-partkey may check five attributes from one metadata element against the samefive attributes in another metadata element to determine if the metadataelements match. Other examples of keys may include 4-part keys, 6-partkeys, 7-part keys or any other suitable keys.

In order to assess and manipulate the metadata, each of the hubs may becoupled to a glossary and/or federated metadata repository. Thefederated metadata repository may contain all of the uniform metadataelements. The federated metadata repository may contain briefdescriptions regarding each metadata element. The metadata elementscontained in the federated metadata repository may be significant butnot crucial to the underlying entity.

A glossary may be used to import technical data from anapplication—e.g., a data catalog. A glossary may also be used to selector enter business-like attributes—e.g., a description—into a metadataelement.

A subset of federated metadata elements may be business-critical. Forthe purposes of this application, such business-critical metadataelements may be labeled governed elements. Governed metadata elementsmay be so labeled because they require greater scrutiny. In someembodiments, a separate repository may hold the governed elements. Therepository may be known as the governed repository, or DMR (datamanagement repository). In some embodiments, the governed elements,included in the DMR, may include more detail than the federatedelements.

The metadata element requirements (which ensure homogeneity of the samemetadata elements) may change periodically, randomly or continuously.Some of the changes may be technical changes. For example, a metadataelement which was previously stored on one server may currently bestored on a second server. A key may usually be coupled to a physicallocation rather than a data type, because a data type may be one of themetadata attributes.

Some of the changes may be business changes. An example of a businesschange may be a change in a description attribute of a metadata element.An exemplary description attribute may describe what an account numberis. Another example of a business element may be a change in aclassification attribute of a metadata element. A classificationattribute may include classification information regarding the metadataelement. Examples of a classification attribute may include an amount,an account or any other suitable classification information.

The system, utilizing a crawler, may ensure that each metadata elementis coupled to the system. The crawler may also ensure that each metadataelement is up-to-date with the current metadata requirements. Thecrawler may inspect each application to make certain that new metadataelements are connected to the system. The crawler also may also ensurethat each metadata element type is up-to-date with the current metadataelement type.

Previously, the process of collecting operational metadata required forgovernance was difficult because it was often difficult to determinedata ownership. Also, there was no common metadata glossary, commonlanguage or domain of values. For the purposes of this application, adomain of values may be a generic label used for substantially similarattributes, e.g., a security classification defined as confidential,proprietary or public. Because there was no common metadata glossary,common language or domain of values, not all the required data elementswere included in the system. At times, there were mistyped key andmetadata information.

In addition, there was no process for keeping governed metadata in syncwith the originating metadata repositories. Data elements which weredeleted in a metadata repository still existed in the governed metadatarepositories.

Therefore, a metadata synchronization system is provided. The system mayestablish a baseline metadata for physical data elements in dataprovisioning hubs. The hubs may connect systems, or applications in eachdomain.

The system may also display substantially all the data elements andtheir baseline metadata on a single page in a metaportal web portal. Thedisplay may show the data elements baseline metadata from all the hubs.The same metaportal page may display the data elements and theirbaseline metadata. The data elements and their baseline metadata may bediscovered via application scans performed by Becubic™. The system mayalso show which data elements match against the governed data elementsstored in DMR. The system may also allow data to be sorted, filtered andexported to an Excel™ spreadsheet or any other suitable document format.

The system may create governed data elements based on elementsdiscovered by the hubs or by the Becubic™ data elements. The system mayenable selection of a hub or Becubic™ data elements and create governeddata elements in DMR. The system may pre-populate, based on theoriginating source, data element creation screens, with keys andbaseline metadata. The system may also allow entry of missinginformation. The system may enable governed data elements to have anoriginating metadata repository attribute where the source will bestored (either a hub or Becubic™).

The system may determine changes between governed database elementsbaseline metadata attribute values in DMR and the originatingrepository. The governed data element technical attribute values may beautomatically updated when a change or updated occurs in the originalrepository. Changes relating to business descriptions may be assigned anew case information view Appian™ workflow and address Data managementteams. Data capture may be established for all goverened data elementattribute value changes including date/time, person who made the changeand/or workflow case number.

The system may also include notification of new governed data elementsand of data element attribute value changes.

The following FIGS. 1A-9B illustratively show, in detail, the metadataarchitecture system described above. Additional detail regarding themetadata architecture system has been described in Appendix A.

FIG. 1A shows an illustrative high level system diagram of certainembodiments. Enterprise hub 102 may control substantially all enterpriseapplications. In certain embodiments, enterprise hub 102 may also becoupled with substantially all enterprise applications. Enterprise hub102 may include data elements baseline metadata 114. Data elementsbaseline metadata 114 may include a list of metadata elements. Someexamples of metadata elements may include location, name and address.The list of metadata elements may be the same list of metadata elementsfor each application controlled by enterprise hub 102. The metadataelements may be synchronized between substantially all applicationsconnected to enterprise hub 102.

In certain embodiments, customer hub 104 may control substantially allcustomer applications. In certain embodiments, customer hub 104 may becoupled with substantially all customer applications. Customer hub 104may include data elements baseline metadata 116. Data elements baselinemetadata 116 may include a list of metadata elements. Some examples ofmetadata elements may include location, name, telephone number andaddress. The list of metadata elements may be the same list of metadataelements for each application controlled by customer hub 104. Themetadata elements may be synchronized between substantially allapplications connected to customer hub 104.

In certain embodiments, card hub 106 may control substantially all cardapplications. In some embodiments, card hub 106 may be coupled withsubstantially all card applications. Card hub 106 may include dataelements baseline metadata 118. Data elements baseline metadata 118 mayinclude a list of metadata elements. Some examples of metadata elementsmay be card owner, card number, expiration date and security code. Thelist of metadata elements may be the same list of metadata elements foreach application controlled by card hub 106. The metadata elements maybe synchronized between substantially all applications connected to cardhub 106.

In some embodiments, mortgage hub 108 may control substantially allmortgage applications. In certain embodiments, mortgage hub 108 may becoupled with substantially all mortgage applications. Mortgage hub 108may include data elements baseline metadata 120. Data elements baseline120 may include a list of metadata elements. Some examples of metadataelements may be borrower name, loan amount, property address andproperty value. The list of metadata elements may be the same list ofmetadata elements for each application controlled by mortgage hub 108.The metadata elements may be synchronized between substantially allapplications connected to mortgage hub 108.

In some embodiments, payments hub 110 may control substantially allpayment applications. In certain embodiments, payments hub 110 may becoupled with substantially all payment applications. Payments hub 110may include data elements baseline metadata 122. Data elements baselinemetadata 122 may include a list of metadata elements. Some examples ofmetadata elements may be payment amount, payer name, payer address andpayer telephone number. The list of metadata elements may be the samelist of metadata elements for each application controlled by paymentshub 110. The metadata elements may be synchronized between substantiallyall applications connected to payments hub 110.

In some embodiments, global wealth and investment management hub 111 maycontrol substantially all wealth and investment applications. Globalwealth and investment management hub may deliver comprehensive wealthmanagement financial solutions to individual and institutional clientsworldwide. In certain embodiments, global wealth agnd investmentmanagement hub may be coupled with substantially all wealth andinvestment applications. Global wealth and investment management hub 111may include data elements baseline metadata 123. Data elements baselinemetadata 123 may include a list of metadata elements. Some examples ofmetadata elements may be investment return rates and investment riskpercentages.

In some embodiments, deposits hub 112 may control substantially alldeposit applications. In certain embodiments, deposits hub 112 may becoupled with substantially all deposit applications. Deposits hub 112may include data elements baseline metadata 124. Data elements baselinemetadata 124 may include a list of metadata elements. Some examples ofmetadata elements may be depositor name, deposit amount and depositdate. The list of metadata elements may be the same list of metadataelements for each application controlled by deposits hub 112. Themetadata elements may be synchronized between substantially allapplications connected to deposits hub 112.

Substantially all of the metadata stored in enterprise hub 102, customerhub 104, card hub 106, mortgage hub 108, payments hub 110, global wealthand investment management hub 111 and deposits hub 112 may betransmitted to federated repositories data elements baseline metadata126. The federated repositories data elements baseline metadata 126 mayinclude core attributes regarding each metadata element. For example,each metadata element may include information regarding where the datais located, information regarding how the data is used and any othersuitable information.

A selective set of metadata may also be included in DMR 138. DMR 138 mayinclude a subset of critical and important metadata elements. Forexample, governed assets, business elements, data elements, criticalmetadata elements, relationships and data quality. The metadata includedin DMR 138 may also be included in federated repositories data elementsbaseline metadata 126. DMR 138 may enable extensive data control on eachmetadata element included in DMR 138. DMR 138 may also enable greaterattribute control for each metadata element included in DMR 138. Thegoverned elements included in DMR 138 may require more attention and/orprecision than operational level metadata.

Metadata element changes may occur in an application, in a repository,in a data store or any other suitable location. Changes may occurbecause of application updates, repository conversions, data storemodifications or any other suitable causes. Federated repositoriessourced governed elements attributes value changes 128 may check thedifferences between DMR 138 and federated repositories data elementsbaseline metadata 126. Value changes 128 may look at both DMR 138 andfederated repositories data elements baseline metadata 126 to determineif there were any technical updates to the metadata. An exemplarytechnical update may be a change in a data type of an attribute to anelement, e.g., data element x may have been of type “string” and waschanged to type “character”.

Appian™ change approval workflow 130 may check both DMR 138 andfederated repositories data elements baseline metadata 126 to determineif there were any business updates to the metadata. An exemplarybusiness update may be a change in the importance of a metadata element,e.g., a previously business critical metadata element may have becomeless significant.

Based on both technical updates and/or business updates, DMR 138 may beupdated appropriately. Interested parties may be notified of workflownotifications, as shown at 132. Interested parties may also be notifiedof new data elements, as shown at 136, data elements creationnotification process. Interested parties may also be notified oftechnical updates, as shown at 134, data element attribute value changenotification process.

When a data element is no longer found in originating metadatarepository, interested parties may be notified via notification 137.

Becubic™ datastore 144 may perform application scans. The applicationscans may check applications and their metadata. The scans may determineif an application is not connected to a hub. The scans may alsodetermine if an application is only partially connected to a hub.Becubic™ datastore 144 may include up-to-date metadata fieldinformation. Becubic™ datastore may include the required metadata fieldsfor each application. Therefore, Becubic™ datastore 144 may determinewhether an application is current with the metadata fields.

In the event that Becubic™ datastore 144 determines a technicaldifference in a metadata element for each application, Becubic™datastore 144 may transmit the inconsistency to Becubic™ sourcedgoverned elements' attributes value changes 142.

At metadata portal technical asset UI (user interface) 140 the systemmay enable an execution team to view the federated metadata elements andthe governed metadata elements. UI 140 may also enable the executionteam to view the overlap in the metadata elements between the federatedmetadata elements and the governed metadata elements. UI 140 may alsoenable the execution team to view the overlap in the metadata elementsbetween Becubic™ metadata elements and the governed metadata elements.

FIG. 1B shows an exemplary hub. The hub shown in FIG. 1B may be acustomer hub. The customer hub may have a central application hub 107connected to many applications, for example, applications 105. Centralapplication hub 107 may receive and transmit information to the variousapplications to which it is connected and/or coupled.

The customer hub may also include application 109. Application 109 mayconnect or be coupled to applications on the left side of the diagram.Application 109 may also retrieve data and/or information from theapplications on the left side of the diagram. Application 109 may becoupled and/or coupled to central application hub 107.

FIG. 2 shows an illustrative detailed system diagram. Hubs 202-212 anddata elements baseline metadata 214-224 have been described above inconnection with FIG. 1, where the hubs and data elements baselinemetadata have been labeled hubs 102-112 and data elements baselinemetadata 114-124.

Hubs 202-212 may transmit the metadata to landing zone 232. Thetransmitted metadata may be a delta transmission, e.g., the differencein the metadata between the current transmission and the lasttransmission. The system may also retrieve all of the metadata once in aspecific time period, e.g., the system may retrieve all the metadatamonthly. The full retrieval may serve as a safety mechanism forinformation that may have gotten lost in the delta transmission. Thelanding zone 232 may transmit the metadata to loading process 234.Loading process 234 may transmit the metadata to data dictionary(Rochade™) 250. During loading process 234, data validation may beperformed to ensure accuracy of the data.

Data dictionary (Rochade™) 250 may include federated repositories dataelements baseline metadata plus sync source identifier 248. Federatedrepositories data elements baseline metadata plus sync source identifier248 may include core attributes regarding each metadata element. Forexample, each metadata element may include information regarding wherethe data is located, information regarding how the data is used, etc.

Data dictionary (Rochade™) 250 may also include DMR dimensions 244. Datadictionary (Rochade™) 250 may also include DMR data elements 5-part keysplus metadata 246.

The metadata may be transmitted from data dictionary 250 to processes258. Processes 258 may determine differences in the metadata, asdescribed above in connection with FIG. 1. Processes 258 may transmitthe business attributes changes to Appian™ changes approval workflow268.

At Appian™ changes approval workflow 268, an execution team may beassigned to the changes. The execution team may meet to discuss thechanges. The execution team may come to a decision regarding themetadata changes. The execution team may instruct an application ownerto implement the changes. Any interested party may be notified of thechanges via notification point 270. In the event that the execution teamdoes not come to a decision regarding the changes, the meeting may bedocumented and the decision may be put on hold for decisioning at alater time. The documentation may include general tracking anddocumentation information relating to the responsible team member, e.g.,next meeting information, time of meeting, person and decision.

Processes 258 may transmit technical changes to data elements valuechange restful web service 262, which may be included in metaportal 260.Appian™ changes 268 may transmit approved business changes to dataelement value change restful web service 264. Also included inmetaportal 260 may be technical asset UI (user interface) 266 and createnew data element restful web service 264. In some embodiments, a landingzone or a global view may be utilized instead of restful services.

Technical asset repository 252 may store metadata that has beendiscovered from Becubic™ application scans. Technical asset repository252 may utilize search index process 254, which may enable the user tosearch both the federated assets and the governed assets. Search indexprocess 254 may be an independent process. Search index process 254 mayutilize Becubic™ information retrieved from technical asset repository252, federated repository information 248 and governed repositoryinformation 246, to create SOLR index. SOLR may be an open sourceenterprise search platform written in Java™ by Apache™. A search engineor framework SOLR setup on a web server that may use the search indexmay enable quick and easy searching, filtering and displaying of boththe federated and governed assets. Search index process 254 may alsoutilize search index 274, which may be included in web service 272. Thestorage iteration—i.e., the transfer of data from Becubic™ 252 tometaportal 260—may be a separate process from the transfer of data fromDMR and federated repositories to metaportal 260. The searchengine/framework may build SOLR index 274 based on the data transfer.

Technical asset repository 252 may also transmit data to process 256.Process 256 may perform a match, using a 5-part key or any othersuitable key, between DMR data elements and Becubic™. The matching maybe based on grouping of metadata elements. Metadata elements may begrouped by column number or any other suitable method. Process 256 mayalso determine baseline attribute value differences.

Create new data element restful web service 264 may transmit new dataelement information to DMR 236. DMR 236 may transmit metadata changes todata element change notification process 225. DMR 236 may also transmitnew metadata elements to data element creation notification process 228.DMR 236 may also transmit attribute value changes to data elementattributes value change notification process 226. DMR 227 may alsotransmit data elements that have been removed from their originatingmetadata repository to data elements no longer found in originatingmetadata repository notification process 227. Notification point 230 maynotify interested parties of changes and new metadata elements.

In some embodiments, selection of a data element on a technical assetuser interface may mark the data element governed. Once the data elementis marked governed, a user may add additional attributes and select asave button to trigger a restful service. In these embodiments, therestful service may be called in response to selection of the savebutton.

DMR 236 may transmit changed and new metadata element information toextract generation process 238. Extract generation process 238 maytransmit changed and new metadata element information to landing zone(directory) 240. Landing zone (directory) 240 may transmit new andchanged metadata element information to loading process 242. Loadingprocess 242 may transmit metadata element information to DMR dimensions244 and DMR data elements 5-part keys plus metadata 246, which are bothincluded in data dictionary (Rochade™) 250. The 5-part keys may beutilized for matching data elements, as described above.

FIG. 3 shows an illustrative attribute value change process betweenfederated repository (Rochade™) and DMR. Flow chart 300 includes swimlane 332—Rochade™. Steps included in swim lane 332 may occur in afederated repository. Flow chart 300 may also include swim lane 334—DMR. Steps included in swim lane 334 may occur in a DMR repository.

A daily process may start at 308. Step 310 may show retrieving DMR dataelements, in which the originating metadata repository attribute is set,from other sources. The process may include retrieving DMR data elementattributes table 304. The process may also include retrieving metadatarepository data elements attribute table.

In certain embodiments, the originating metadata repository attributemay determine which repository data was synched from (e.g., customer,card, etc.). Governed elements, from DMR, may be selected and comparedto metadata elements pulled into the federated repository from someequivalent repository.

Step 312 shows comparing a set of DMR data elements to a set of metadatarepository data elements. In a perfect reconciliation, the data elementsincluded in the DMR data element repository and the data elementsincluded in the metadata repository should match—i.e., the elementsincluded in both metadata repositories should be the same.

A key may be used to check if the data elements from one metadatarepository match the data elements from the other metadata repository.In some embodiments, a 6-part key may be used. The 6-part key maycompare six attributes from each metadata element in one metadatarepository to six attributes of each metadata element in the othermetadata repository. The system may perform a match, when a sixattribute combination for one data element matches a six attributecombination for the same data element in a different metadatarepository.

In certain embodiments, a determination may be performed as to whetherthe data source still exists. For example, when an account numberelement is transferred from a customer hub into DMR (governed system),one can delete the account number from the customer hub and/or therelated application.

When the system performs a metadata element match—i.e., a metadataelement found in one metadata repository was matched in another metadatarepository—as queried at 314, the process may proceed to step 316. Whenthe system does not perform a metadata element match, the process mayproceed to step 320. While each shared metadata element may have adifferent title in different systems, for example, one system mayidentify a metadata element as data type string and another system mayidentify the metadata element as data type number, if the components arethe same—i.e., the data included in both metadata elements aresubstantially equivalent—the elements may match regardless of theirrespective titles.

Step 316 shows a scenario wherein the data elements are matched by the6-part key, but the values included in the attributes do not match. Step318 shows checking, using a 6-part key and attribute name match, foreach difference between attribute values, if the attribute is already inthe process of being evaluated. This may avoid the execution teamsreviewing duplicate changes.

Query 328 shows, if the changes are being worked on, completing theprocess, as shown at 330. Query 328 shows, when the changes not beingworked on, transmitting to and storing the changes in DMR/Federatedrepository attribute value changes, as shown at 326. In certainembodiments, values stored, as shown at 326, may be used by Appian™workflow to be evaluated. Values stored, as shown at 326, may also beused by DMR to apply changes.

Step 324 shows when changes are in the process of being modified, thesystem may save those changes to a data elements in the process of beingmodified table.

In a scenario where the 6-part key does not produce a match, the systemmay show updating the DMR table, as shown at 320. Updating may includetruncating the data and inserting the data into the DMR table. Step 322may show storing the unmatched data elements in an originating metadatarepository table. In certain embodiments, an unmatched data element maybe a data element which may be found in one repository and not found inanother repository.

FIG. 4 shows an illustrative change process between Becubic™ metadatarepository and DMR. Flow chart 400 includes swim lanes 402—Becubic™,404—Rochade™ and 406—DMR. Steps included in swim lane 402 may occur in aBecubic™ repository. Steps included in swim lane 404 may occur in aRochade™ repository. Steps included in swim lane 406 may occur in a DMRrepository.

Step 416 shows a start of a daily process. Initially, the process mayretrieve DMR data element attribute table 412 from Rochade™ 410, asshown at 414. The process may only retrieve data elements where themetadata repository attribute is Becubic™—i.e., data elements thatshould also be included in Becubic™ repository 408. The process may alsoretrieve data elements from Becubic™ repository 408.

Step 418 shows comparing the data elements retrieved from Becubic™ 408to the data elements included in table 412. A 5-part key may be utilizedto perform the comparing. Data elements where the originating repositorymay be equivalent to Becubic™ may be selected from DMR data elements intable 412.

For each data element compared, if the 5-part key matches, the processgoes through query 420 and proceeds to step 422. For each data elementcompared, if the 5-part key does not match, the process goes throughquery 420 and proceeds to step 430.

In certain embodiments, a determination may be performed as to whetherthe metadata source still exists. The determination may be performed bychecking against Becubic™ Repository (408). Becubic™ repository may beupdated when Becubic™ is used to scan or rescan applications. Forexample, when an account number metadata element is transferred fromBecubic™ repository 408 into DMR, the account number metadata elementmay be deleted from the application originally scanned by Becubic™ andthen removed from Becubic™ repository 408 based on the rescan.

Step 420 shows a scenario where the attribute names of the data elementsfrom both Becubic™ and table 412 match, but the attribute values do notmatch. Step 424 shows for each attribute value difference, checking,utilizing a 6-part key and an attribute name match, if the valuedifference is being worked on. If the changes are being worked on, theprocess completes at 428, as shown at 426. If the changes are not beingworked on, the process proceeds to step 436. Step 436 may show storingthe attribute value differences in a DMR/Federated repositoriesattribute value changes table. In certain embodiments, the values storedin 426 may be used by Appian™ workflow to assign an execution to team tothe changes and execute the changes. The values stored in 426 may alsobe used by DMR to apply the changes.

Step 434 shows a view in which a user can view the data elementscurrently being modified. The view described at 434 may enable a user todetermine the attribute differences, as described in connection withstep 424.

In some embodiments, step 434 may include receiving informationregarding data elements currently being modified. The system may savethe data elements currently being modified in a data elements currentlybeing modified table. This may ensure that more than one execution teamis not working on the same data element that requires change.

In a scenario where the key does not match, as queried at 420, theprocess may proceed to step 430. Step 430 includes updating table 412.Updating may include truncating and inserting data elements into table412. The data elements being updated may be transmitted to, and storedin, a DMR data elements where same data elements do not exist inoriginating metadata repository table, as shown at 432. Step 432 mayalso include viewing the unmatched data elements in a DMR data elementswhere the same data elements do not exist in originating metadatarepository table.

FIG. 5 shows a business attributes' values changes governance workflow.Flow chart 500 includes swim lane 502 —case manager, swim lane 504—caseuser, swim lane 506 —business process management (“BPM”) and swim lane508—DMR.

The process may begin in the BPM, as shown at 514. BPM may refer to anengine or software such as Appian™. Step 516 shows monitoring for newattribute value differences. Step 516 may be in communication,preferably at least once a day or at some other suitable time period,with step 518. Step 518 shows viewing a listing of new businessattribute value differences. Step 516 may transmit the new attributevalue differences to the listing of business attribute value differencesat DMR, as shown at 518. 518 may be an actual database view that mayinclude the differences, while 516 may check for the changes to actupon.

Step 520 shows creating one case or a plurality of cases based oninputted or retrieved business attribute value differences. Step 522shows inserting a case key associated with the case or plurality ofcases into a DMR Appian™ table. BPM may transmit the Appian™ caseinformation to a table in DMR, as shown at 524. For the purposes of thisapplication, a case may be understood to refer to a metadata elementthat requires modification. A case may also be understood to mean a unitof work that has attributes grouped together logically, using a key, andenables the unit of work to be processed. The term “being processed” mayinclude assigning work, document work, document decisions and/or anyother suitable processing information.

When the insert is successful, the process may proceed to step 528, asshown at 526. When the insert is unsuccessful, the process proceeds backto step 520, which shows creating a case or a plurality of cases basedon inputs. When the insert is unsuccessful, the process may create aretry instance. The retry instance may manage potential technical issuesthat may arise when writing into an external table.

Step 528 shows triggering an email notification. The email notificationmay inform users and managers of a new case creation. Step 530 showsmaking the case available to a data management team. The data managementteam may modify and adjust the cases according to its skill and tools atits disposal. Upon assigning a data management team, the process mayproceed to step 510 or step 512.

Step 510 shows that a case manager, within a data management team, mayassign the case to himself or to a case user. Step 512 shows a case userreviewing the case assigned by a manager. The case user may assign thecase to himself if he has the appropriate skills. The case user maymodify the case by assigning a meeting date. Upon discussion of the caseat the meeting, the case user may enter the decision and submit thecase.

Upon entering the decision and submitting the case, the process mayproceed to step 532. Step 532 shows the BPM may update a database withthe decision and basic tracking information.

When the update is unsuccessful, the process may proceed back to step532. When the update is unsuccessful, the process may create a retryinstance. The retry instance may deal with potential technical issuesthat may arise when writing into an external table. When the update issuccessful, the process may proceed to step 536. Step 536 showstriggering transmission of email notifications. Step 532 shows savingthe decisions. The saved decisions may be used to either update DMR at alater point in time or document what will be done by the applicationowner in the original system of origin. The email notifications may betransmitted to a data management group. The email notifications may alsobe transmitted to the case owner. The case owner, together with the datamanagement group may determine a decision about how to proceed with ametadata element. The decision may be submitted upon transmission of theemail notifications. Upon transmission of the submission, the case maybe resolved, as shown at 538. The process may terminate at 540.

In certain embodiments, notification may occur after the decision isentered. The notification may be transmitted to a case worker andsubject matter expert (“SME”) that a decision has been made and thecontents of the decision.

FIG. 6 shows a business attributes' value changes governance workflowuser interface (“UI”). A business person may utilize UI 600 for eachcase in order to resolve the case. Entry box 602 may include caseinformation such as case creation date, originating metadata repository,case worker and case ID. Some fields may be editable while other fieldsmay be not editable.

Entry box 604 may include fields relating to the data element such as,application inventory tool (“AIT”), server, database location, schema,table/file and field/columns. An AIT may be a system in whichapplications are registered and related information, such as an owner orcontact, are stored. In some embodiments, AIT may refer to anapplication. The fields may be a method of grouping attributeslogically. Entry box 606 may include meeting information. The meetinginformation may include a data management group. The meeting informationmay also include a meeting date. A case user that is assigned to a casemay be part of a data management team. A meeting date may be scheduledwith the case user and a SME. The meeting may enable the case user toretrieve information and make a decision regarding the case.

A business person may attach a relevant file, as it relates to thecurrent case, e.g., an email exchange with an SME, using entry box 608.The left portion—“Current case what changed section”—of the box mayinclude information relating to the differences between DMR andorigination metadata repository. The right portion—“metadata changesection”—of the box may relate to the decision to be made based on thechange(s).

Included in the “Current case what changed” portion may be attributeswhere values in DMR and originating metadata repository differ. Theattributes displayed, and the value differences associated therewith maybe determined by the change process discussed in FIG. 4.

The “metadata change section” may include a metaportal change fieldyes/no selection. In this embodiment, metaportal may be synonymous withDMR. Metaportal may be a term used for business users as opposed todevelopers. A user may select yes if a DMR or metaportal attribute valuerequires changing to a metadata repository attribute value. A user mayselect no if a DMR attribute value does not require change. The“metadata change section” portion may also include a decision commentsentry field. The decision comments entry field may enable a user toenter comments regarding the decision.

The “metadata change section” portion may also include a target datepicker. The target date picker may preferably be enabled only if thereis no DMR change. The target date picker may enable a user to set adeadline when the attribute value change should occur. The decisionscomments and the target date picker may be used to document decisionsregarding changes that will be made by application owners in a sourcesystem as opposed to DMR or federated metadata repository.

Entry box 612 may include information regarding the attribute values.The information may include the last instance when the attribute values,included in the DMR, did not match the attribute values included in themetadata repository. The information may assist the user in determiningthe current modifications. Entry box 612 may display a matchingattribute that has been modified previously. Entry box 612 may includeinformation regarding the case, values and information regarding thedecision that was made. Historical information may enable the case userto understand the previous issues and make a well-informed decision.

FIG. 7 shows consumer bank metaportal UI 700. UI 700 may show technicaldata elements. Data elements may represent a grouping of attributesusing 5-part keys (server —702, database/location—704, schema—706,table—708 and columns/fields). Additional, alternative groupings mayalso be utilized. For each data element, a user may view informationrelating to the element. For each data element, a user may also view thematching DMR-governed data identification number. A data element mayinclude a grouping of attributes. The system may display information formany sources—e.g., Becubic™, customer hub, card hub. The system may alsodisplay where each data element matched a DMR data element or where adata element did not match a DMR data element.

Each row may represent a unique instance of a data element based on theoccurrence of the data element in the originating source, e.g.,Becubic™, DMR, Customer Hub, Card Hub, etc. The row may includeinformation relating to the data element. The information may beidentified via the columns. The columns may include server—702,database/location—704, schema—706, table—708, column/field—710, dataelement ID—712, AIT—714, lineage —716, business description—718. Keys702, 704, 706, 708 and 710 may be displayed and matched to DMR (712).Additional general information, such as AIT lineage, and additionalattributes retrieved from metadata repository, such as businessdescription, class word, and data type may be displayed as well.

A user may view the total amount of data elements, as shown at 720. Auser may also click on a column to sort the data elements based on theselected column, as shown at 722. A user may view the retrieved matchfrom DMR governed data, as shown at column 712. A user may be enabled tofilter the data elements, as shown at 724.

A filtering box may be provided. The filtering box may enable a userfilter based on data element id—728, AIT—number—730, server—732,database/location—734, schema—736, table/file—738, column/field—740,data element active—742, key data element—744, derived—746, lineage—748,data quality (“DQ”) measured—750 as well as any other suitable filteringcriterion. A user may filter with more than one filtering criterion. Auser may select clear all button 752 to clear the current filteringcriteria. A user may select cancel button 754 to cancel the filteredsearch. A user may select search button 756 to search using the currentfiltering criteria. Some selections may be prefilled based on dataalready known to the system.

A user may export the search to an Excel™ spreadsheet, or other suitablefile, as shown at 726. This may enable a user to manipulate thespreadsheet using Microsoft Excel™ functionalities.

In some embodiments, the user interface may include a function thatenables a user to select data elements unmatched to DMR data elementsand move the data elements to DMR in order to become governed elements.

FIG. 8 shows a database model. The database model may representattribute value changes between Rochade™, Appian™ and DMR staging. Thedatabase model may enable each user to receive a database sectionreferring to him, while preferably, substantially simultaneouslyallowing the user to view, on the diagram, multiple changes in progress.Because the user may view all of the changes in progress on the databasemodel, the database model may enable the removal of RESTful services.This may be because RESTful services may facilitate the transfer ofchange information from one user to another. The database diagram mayremove the need to utilize a complex query to retrieve information. Auser may view the database model, and the links between the tables, inorder to retrieve information. The database diagram may also limitduplicate information because substantially all the information isavailable to the user. The user may view the information currently inthe database model prior to adding information to the database model.

Table 802, may be included in Appian™. Table 802 may show work inprogress changes. Table 804 may be included in Rochade™. Table 804 mayinclude workflow metadata related to data element attribute changes.Table 806 may be a dimension table utilized for constraints. Theconstraint(s) may relate to a metadata owner group. For the purposes ofthis application, constraints may be understood to refer to rules thatmay be enforced on data columns on a database table. The rules may beused to limit the type of data that can be entered into a table. Therules may ensure accuracy and reliability of the data in the database.Constraints may be column level constraints or table level constraints.The metadata owner group may determine a group assignment for eachworkflow case.

Table 808 may be included in Rochade™. Table 808 may contain dataelement attribute changes. Table 810 may be a dimension table used forconstraints. Table 810 may be an originating metadata repository. Data816 may be exemplary data included in table 810. Table 812 may beincluded in Appian™. Table 812 may show work in progress changes. Table814 may be a dimension table used for constraints. The constraint mayrelate to a data element column. Data 818 may be exemplary data includedin table 814.

Table 820 may be included in Rochade™. Table 820 may include dataelements which are not matched in a metadata repository. Table 822 maybe utilized by DMR. Table 822 may include metaportal changes. Themetaportal changes have been explained further in connection with FIG.6, lead line 610.

FIG. 8 may show a model that allows for a common staging area. Thestaging model may eliminate passing information between process. Thestaging model may also resolve conflict resolution, as each systemswrites to its own space on its own time and/or terms. Each system mayalso encapsulate common validation via constraints and business logic.

FIG. 9 shows a database model diagram relating to metadata repositories'landing zone and DMR staging tables. Table 902 may include added,deleted and updated changes. Table 902 may be a main delta table and afull load table. Table 902 may be updated once daily. Table 902 may bewhere hub and application information is stored.

Table 904 may be a dimension table used for constraints. Table 904 maybe a maintenance entry table. The maintenance entry table may include anadd indicator, a delete indicator and an update indicator.

Table 906 may be as dimension table used for constraints. The constraintmay relate to feeds used by sub-entities.

Table 908 may be a dimension table used for constraints. The constraintsmay relate to a data domain.

Table 910 may be a dimension table used for constraints. The constraintsmay relate to confidential information such as, securities, financialinstruments, corporate confidential information, non-public corporateinformation, non-public personal information and material non-publicinformation.

Table 912 may be a dimension table used for constraints. The constraintsmay relate to private personal data, such as, age, gender, maritalstatus, insurance information, social security number/tax identificationnumber, risk rating as well as any other suitable data.

Table 914 may be a dimension table used for constraints. The constraintsmay relate to database field tags, such as name, number, object,percent, quality, etc.

Table 916 may be a dimension table used for constraints. The constraintsmay relate to database field tags for security and privacy, such as,confidential, proprietary and public. Dimension tables and orconstraints may prevent invalid data to be inserted. Payload processesmay be rejected based on the invalid data prevention. Therefore, payloadprocesses may be returned to application owners for resolve. A dimensiontable may be a domain of values. The values may be used for a givenattribute.

Table 918 may be a data controls table. The table may be referred to asa customer data provision manifest journal. The customer data provisionmanifest journal may control the information relating to a specific hub,for example, a customer hub.

Each data load may have a manifest describing the load. The manifest maybe used to validate the load. While there may be many validationmethods, a specific method may verify a total count in order to ensurethat the number of inserts actually were inserted into the table.

Table 920 may be a main delta table. Table 920 may be a full load table.The table may contain all data—i.e., it may be a full reload. Table 920may be updated monthly. Table 920 may be substantially similar to table902, although it may not include the following columns: DATA_PRVSN_TS,DATA_PRVSN_MNFST_ID and MANTN_ENTR_CD.

Table 922 may be a domain mapping table. Table 922 may relate to anoriginating metadata repository.

Thus, methods and apparatus for a metadata synchronization system havebeen provided. Persons skilled in the art will appreciate that thepresent invention can be practiced by other than the describedembodiments, which are presented for purposes of illustration ratherthan of limitation, and that the present invention is limited only bythe claims that follow.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for synchronizing metadata across aplurality of applications, the system comprising: the plurality ofapplications, wherein each application included in the plurality ofapplications is coupled to an application hub included in a plurality ofapplication hubs, said each application comprising a plurality ofmetadata elements; the application hubs, each application hub comprisinga data elements baseline metadata, said data elements baseline metadatacontrolling the plurality of metadata elements associated with eachapplication to which it is coupled; a federated metadata repositorycoupled to each application hub, said federated metadata repositoryconfigured to receive, from the application hubs, the plurality ofmetadata elements from each application; a governed metadata repositorycoupled to the federated metadata repository, the governed metadatarepository configured to receive a subset of metadata elements from thefederated metadata repository; and a crawler configured to crawl theapplications to ensure that: each metadata element included in thepluralities of metadata elements is coupled to the federated metadatarepository; and each metadata element is up to date with a current setof metadata requirements.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein theplurality of application hubs comprise at least one of: an enterprisehub; a customer hub; a card hub; a mortgage hub; a global wealth andinvestment management hub; a payments hub; and a deposits hub.
 3. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein the metadata elements included in thegoverned metadata repository are entity-critical metadata elements. 4.The system of claim 3, wherein the metadata elements included in thegoverned metadata repository comprise greater detail with respect to themetadata elements included in the federated metadata repository.
 5. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein upon identification, by the crawler, of ametadata element in an application, that is not up to date with thecurrent set of metadata requirements, the crawler is configured totransmit a notification message to an owner of the application, themessage comprising the metadata element and the current metadata elementrequirements.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the crawler may befurther configured to crawl the plurality of applications to identify anew metadata element in an application that is not coupled to thefederated metadata repository.
 7. The system of claim 6, wherein: inresponse to identification that the new metadata element is not coupledto the federated metadata repository, the crawler is configured totransmit a notification message to persons associated with the owner ofthe application, the message comprising the new metadata element and thecurrent metadata element requirements; and in response to thetransmission of a notification message to persons associated with theowner of the application, the system is configured to insert the newmetadata element into the federated metadata repository according to thecurrent metadata element requirements.
 8. The system of claim 1,wherein: the crawler is further configured to crawl the plurality ofapplications to identify an out-of-date metadata element in anapplication that is coupled to the federated metadata repository; inresponse to identification that the out-of-date metadata element iscoupled to the federated metadata repository, the crawler is configuredto transmit a notification message to persons associated with the ownerof the application, the message comprising the out-of-date metadataelement and the current metadata element requirements; and in responseto the transmission of a notification message to persons associated withthe owner of the application, the system is configured to update theout-of-date metadata element in the federated metadata repository. 9.The system of claim 1, wherein: the crawler is further configured tocrawl the plurality of applications to identify an extinct metadataelement in an application that is coupled to the federated metadatarepository; in response to identification that the extinct metadataelement is coupled to the federated metadata repository, the crawler isconfigured to transmit a notification message to persons associated withthe owner of the application, the message comprising the extinctmetadata element and the current metadata element requirements; and inresponse to the transmission of a notification message to personsassociated with the owner of the application, the system is configuredto remove the metadata element from the federated metadata repository.10. The system of claim 7, wherein, the system is further configured toenable a user, via a user interface, to make changes to the metadataelement.
 11. A system for synchronizing metadata across a plurality ofapplications, the system comprising: the plurality of applications,wherein each application included in the plurality of applications iscoupled to an application hub included in a plurality of applicationhubs, each of said applications comprising a plurality of metadataelements, each application hub comprising data elements baselinemetadata, said data elements baseline metadata controlling the pluralityof metadata elements associated with each application to which it iscoupled; a federated metadata repository, the federated metadatarepository coupled to each application hub, the federated metadatarepository configured to receive the pluralities of metadata elements; agoverned metadata repository, the governed metadata repository coupledto the federated metadata repository, the governed metadata repositoryconfigured to receive a subset of the pluralities of metadata elements;a technical discrepancy processor coupled to the federated metadatarepository and the governed metadata repository, the technicaldiscrepancy processor configured to determine technical discrepanciesbetween metadata elements stored in the federated metadata repositoryand the governed metadata repository; a technical notification processorcoupled to the technical discrepancy processor, the technicalnotification processor configured to transmit a technical notificationmessage to an execution team, the technical notification messagecomprising the determined technical discrepancies; a businessdiscrepancy processor coupled to the federated metadata repository andthe governed metadata repository, the business discrepancy processorconfigured to determine business discrepancies between metadata elementsstored in the federated metadata repository and the governed metadatarepository; and a business notification processor coupled to thebusiness discrepancy processor, the business notification processorconfigured to transmit a business notification message to the executionteam, the business notification message being triggered by adetermination of the business discrepancies.
 12. The system of claim 11,wherein the federated metadata repository is coupled to each applicationhub via a landing zone and a loading process.
 13. The system of claim11, further comprising a crawler, wherein the crawler is configured toensure that: each metadata element included in the pluralities ofmetadata elements is coupled to the federated metadata repository; andeach metadata element satisfies a current set of metadata requirements.14. The system of claim 13, wherein upon identification, by the crawler,of a metadata element in an application, that does not satisfy thecurrent set of metadata requirements, the crawler is configured totransmit a notification message to an owner of the application, themessage comprising the metadata element and the current metadata elementrequirements.
 15. The system of claim 14, wherein, in response to anidentification of a metadata element by the crawler, said metadataelement that is not coupled to the federated metadata repository, thecrawler is configured to transmit a notification message to personsassociated with the owner of the application, the message comprising themetadata element and the current metadata element requirements.
 16. Thesystem of claim 14, wherein the crawler may be further configured tocrawl the plurality of applications to identify a metadata element in anapplication that is not coupled to the federated metadata repository.17. The system of claim 11, wherein the metadata elements included inthe governed metadata repository are entity-critical metadata elements.18. The system of claim 11, wherein the metadata elements included inthe governed metadata repository comprise a greater magnitude of fieldsthan the metadata elements included in the federated metadatarepository.
 19. A method for metadata synchronization comprising:receiving, at a federated metadata repository, a plurality of metadataelements, said plurality of metadata element being transmitted from aplurality of applications, said plurality of applications being coupledto a plurality of application hubs; receiving, at a governed metadatarepository, a subset of the plurality of metadata elements; crawling,via a crawler, the plurality of applications, to determine that eachmetadata element included in the plurality of metadata elements has beenreceived at the federated metadata repository; transmitting a firstnotification message to a first user in the event that a metadataelement is not received at the federated metadata repository; crawling,via the crawler, the federated metadata repository and the governedmetadata repository to determine whether each metadata element that isincluded in both of the federated metadata repository and the governedmetadata repository are identified using the same data type; uponidentification of a metadata element which is identified using one datatype in the federated metadata repository and another data type in thegoverned metadata repository, conforming, via a processor, the data typeof identified metadata element included in the federated metadatarepository and the data type of the identified metadata element includedin the governed metadata repository.
 20. The method of claim 19, furthercomprising: transmitting a second notification message to a second userupon completion of the conforming; crawling, via the crawler, thefederated metadata repository and the governed metadata repository todetermine which metadata elements, included in the plurality of metadataelements should be assigned a governed status; notifying the user whichmetadata elements were determined to be governed metadata elements. 21.The method of claim 20, wherein the first user is an application ownerassociated with the metadata element that has not been received at thefederated metadata repository.
 22. The method of claim 21, furthercomprising crawling, via the crawler, the plurality of applications, toensure that a data type associated with each of the metadata elements,included in the plurality of metadata elements, is the same in thefederated metadata repository, the governed metadata repository and theplurality of applications.
 23. The method of claim 22, furthercomprising upon determination by the crawler that at least one dataelement is not the same data type in the federated metadata repository,governed metadata repository and the plurality of applications,transmitting a third notification message to a third user, the thirdnotification message comprising the discrepancy.
 24. The method of claim23, wherein, upon determination by the crawler that at least one dataelement is not the same data type in the federated metadata repository,the governed metadata repository and the plurality of applications,transmitting a third notification message to the first user and thesecond user, the third notification message comprising the discrepancy.